Indian and 5 ROBBER state governments refuse to admit that MEMORY ROBBERY of goa 1989 jee topper without a legally valid reason since 2010 is a CYBERCRIME on her

Indicating the rampant human rights abuses in India, worsening status of educated women, Indian and 5 state governments, security agencies in goa, karnataka, maharastra, madhya pradesh, haryana refuse to admit that MEMORY ROBBERY of goa 1989 jee topper,a harmless single woman engineer, private citizen without a legally valid reason since 2010 is a CYBERCRIME on her causing her great FINANCIAL LOSSES

Indian Lawyers have confirmed that stealing data of a private citizen is a CYBERCRIME under indian cyberlaw using MEMORY ROBBERY equipment, computer hacking, yet bribed allegedly by google, tata, the CYBERCRIMINAL state governments continue to steal the data, FALSELY CLAIMING that she has agreed to it or that she is a security threat. These CYBERCRIMINAL state governments refuse to get a court order for the memory ROBBERY.

Like the IIT Kharagpur Anjali-Sundar pichai romance, the vrushali puneet college romance in india’s top college was well known, and the single domain investor, engineer has no connection with any raw/cbi/ntro employees in college or afterwards, which can be legally proved. Yet being one of the greatest actors, frauds in India, the mhow monster ntro employee puneet convinced everyone that the CYBERCRIME, FAKE CLAIMS was to help the domain investor, and also encouraged a large number of greedy fraud R&AW/NTRO employees in following his footsteps to ROB the single domain investor of everything, make fake claims about the bank account, savings, domains

Additionally indicating the complete lack of honesty, these robber state governments are falsely claiming that the ROBBED information legally belongs to the various raw/cbi employees , when they do not do any kind of computer work, do not invest money in domains, and there is no way they can acquire the information legally since the well paid raw/cbi employees also do not contact the engineer, since they consider her low status, without any legal rights.